Politics     [all categories]
  News
  Iranians lose faith in pivotal murder trial

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Iranians lose faith in pivotal murder trial
Vatandoost
Member
posted January 08, 2001 09:52     Click Here to See the Profile for Vatandoost   Click Here to Email Vatandoost     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The Guardian
Geneive Abdo in Tehran

18 'rogue' agents accused of killing dissidents

Saturday January 6, 2001

The decision by the Iranian judiciary to hold hearings in secret into the murder of four dissidents by "rogue" intelligence agents has prompted claims that the proceedings are designed to protect senior officials and
clerics rather than uncover the truth. Since the court sessions began on December 23, claims that the wrong defendants are on trial have sparked renewed national tensions.

"The court hearings on the serial murders case are not satisfying public opinion," said the reformist MP Naser Qavami, head of the parliamentary committee on judicial affairs. "It seems there is no hope that this court will administer justice properly."

Eighteen "rogue" agents from the intelligence ministry are accused of murdering four liberal dissidents in late 1998: nationalist politicians Darioush and Parvaneh Forouhar, and writers Mohammad Mokhtari and Mohammad
Jafar Pouyandeh.

Reformists allege that the killings were part of a campaign by state-sponsored death squads to silence dissent.

But conservatives blame what they say are links between the reformist camp and the killers, with the murders designed to discredit the clerical establishment and force an overhaul of the security services.

Two pro-reform journalists and a former interior minister say the real number of those killed was as high as 80, with murders and mysterious disappearances stretching over a decade. They say that senior clerics conspired with high-ranking intelligence officials to carry out the murders.

The two journalists and former minister are now in jail. And the judiciary, dominated by conservative clerics, has vowed to prosecute anyone else making "unauthorised revelations" in the case.

Whatever the outcome in the trial, it is clear that the proceedings reflect Iran's troubled political atmosphere more than any quest for the truth.

What began as a promise by President Mohammad Khatami and his allies to clean up the feared ministry of intelligence has largely evaporated in the face of entrenched conservative opposition.

Mystery surrounds the selection of the murder victims, who posed no threat to Iran's Islamic political order. Some reformists have suggested it was part of a proposed reign of terror. But no coherent pattern has emerged to date, although scattered press reports indicate that the plotters worked for months to identify and then eliminate their victims.

In the case of the elderly Farouhar couple, the killers were said to have posed as a film crew making a documentary about their political activities. These same reports say intelligence ministry microphones planted inside their Tehran flat picked up the sound of their brutal murders.

The case began unravelling when the intelligence ministry said renegade agents were responsible for the murders. The announcement shocked the nation and many became hopeful that the murderers would be brought to justice.

But since that time, the case has been fraught with drama, suspicion, and confessions that many believe are fake.

In June 1999 the authorities announced that the ring-leader, a deputy intelligence minister identified variously as Saeed Emami and Saeed Eslami, had died in prison after drinking hair remover. Many remain sceptical of the official ruling of suicide, preferring to see the beginnings of a cover-up.

Two crusading journalists, Akbar Ganji and Emaddedin Baqi, then published a series of allegations that linked the murders to the hardline clerical establishment in what they said amounted to a campaign of state-sponsored terror.

Confusion then set in within the top ranks of the government and the judiciary - special commissions and prosecutors came and went. Charges of torture against the first investigators left most Iranians with little
hope that the truth will ever be known.

The presiding judge in the case contributed to the prevailing scepticism by barring the public and the press from court sessions to protect national security interests.

"Who can guarantee that an open court would not provide information to the enemies outside the country?" said Judge Mohammad Reza Aqiqi. The victims' families are boycotting the proceedings to protest at the judiciary's decision to restrict the prosecution to only four murders.

At least five defendants have reportedly confessed, and one said he was aware of the murders but took no active part.

The case, initially regarded as a test of whether President Khatami could keep his promise to cleanse the intelligence ministry of political crimes, now reveals his lack of power.

Two years ago Mr Khatami appointed an independent commission to uncover the truth behind the murders. Its revelations helped to bring the case to trial, but failed to expose conclusive information about the culprits.

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Iran Online | Privacy Statement

Iran Online is the registered trade mark of  Manou & Associates Inc.
Copyright © 1998 Virtual factor LLC, All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c

The IranOnline.com